1952 Citroen 15 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 15 would be higher. At 2,867 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Citroen 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 15. (76 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Citroen 15 (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Citroen 15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Citroen 15 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 15 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2867 cc | 2487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
