1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 1976 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1976 Lotus Eclat is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 555 kg more than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1976 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 2CV | 1976 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | 2CV | Eclat |
Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |