1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1988 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1952 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1952 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Citroen 2CV | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 11 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
