1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 540 kg more than 1952 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi (108 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Citroen | Seat |
| Model | 2CV | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 11 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1035 kg |
