1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Rover 75

To start off, 2003 Rover 75 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Rover 75 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Rover 75 weights approximately 895 kg more than 1952 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Rover 75 (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Citroen 2CV 2003 Rover 75
Make Citroen Rover
Model 2CV 75
Year Released 1952 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 375 cc 1795 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Horse Power 11 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 22 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 495 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 3790 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2750 mm