1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | 2CV | Epica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |