1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Ka |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 11 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 40 L |
