1952 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | 2CV | Megane |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |