1952 Daihatsu Bee vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Daihatsu Bee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Daihatsu Bee would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2000 kg more than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. (36 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Daihatsu Bee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Daihatsu Bee | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Land Rover |
| Model | Bee | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 4396 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 36 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 515 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2000 mm | 2890 mm |
