1952 Daihatsu Bee vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Daihatsu Bee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Daihatsu Bee would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1237 kg more than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (369 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Daihatsu Bee. (36 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Daihatsu Bee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Daihatsu Bee | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Bee | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 3932 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 36 Nm | 369 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 515 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2000 mm | 2730 mm |
