1952 DKW F 89 vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, both 1952 DKW F 89 and 1952 Triumph Mayflower were released in the same year (1952). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Triumph Mayflower (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Triumph Mayflower should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | DKW | Triumph |
| Model | F 89 | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1580 mm |
