1952 DKW F 89 vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 206 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1952 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |