1952 DKW F 89 vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 1980 Zastava 132 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 132 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | DKW | Zastava |
| Model | F 89 | 132 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
