1952 DKW F 89 vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Polo (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 110 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | F 89 | Polo |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |