1952 DKW F 89 vs. 1998 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 605 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 1998 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
