1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 385 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |