1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econoline (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2020 mm |
