1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 DKW F 89. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1952 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1952 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | DKW | Land Rover |
Model | F 89 | LR2 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2180 mm |