1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 255 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | F 89 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1680 mm |
