1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo S60 (209 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 688 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1952 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1952 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | F 89 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
