1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 554 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 DKW F 89. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | F 89 | Compass |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1464 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |