1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | F 89 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
