1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | F 89 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |