1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 391 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | F 89 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1301 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1755 mm |
