1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 699 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1952 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1952 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | F 89 | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1839 mm |