1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 402 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 957 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 89 | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | F 89 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 426 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1867 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1918 mm |
