1952 DKW F 89 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2013 Smart Fortwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Smart Fortwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Smart Fortwo should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1952 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1952 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 89 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | DKW | Smart |
Model | F 89 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |