1952 DKW F 91 vs. 1989 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1989 Ford Tempo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Tempo (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Tempo weights approximately 260 kg more than 1952 DKW F 91. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 DKW F 91. (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 91 | 1989 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 91 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 894 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2540 mm |
