1952 DKW F 91 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 160 kg more than 1952 DKW F 91. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 DKW F 91. (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 91 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | F 91 | Midge |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 894 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |