1952 DKW F 91 vs. 2005 Ford Ikon
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ikon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ikon (74 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ikon weights approximately 153 kg more than 1952 DKW F 91. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ikon (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 DKW F 91. (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ikon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 91 | 2005 Ford Ikon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 91 | Ikon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 894 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1043 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2460 mm |
