1952 DKW F 91 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 DKW F 91. (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 91 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | F 91 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 894 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2690 mm |
