1952 DKW F 91 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 DKW F 91. (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 DKW F 91 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | F 91 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 894 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2480 mm |
