1952 DKW F 91 vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 894 cc (3 cylinders), 1952 DKW F 91 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Tata Nano (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Tata Nano should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 DKW F 91 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 91, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 DKW F 91 (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 DKW F 91 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1952 DKW F 91 | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | DKW | Tata |
Model | F 91 | Nano |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 894 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 73.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2230 mm |