1952 Ferrari 212 vs. 1950 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1952 Ferrari 212 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,561 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 212 (163 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1950 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 1950 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 75 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ferrari 212 | 1950 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
| Model | 212 | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2561 cc | 1246 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 63 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 45 L |
