1952 Ferrari 212 vs. 1964 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1964 Ford Falcon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1952 Ferrari 212. (163 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1952 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ferrari 212 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ferrari 212 | 1964 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 212 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2561 cc | 2890 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 20.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 700 kg |
