1952 Ferrari 212 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,561 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 212 (163 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 65 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212.
Because 1952 Ferrari 212 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 212. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 212 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ferrari | Renault |
Model | 212 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2561 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 50 L |