1952 Ferrari 212 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Ferrari 212. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 298 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 212 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ferrari | Ford |
Model | 212 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2562 cc | 3802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 59 L |