1952 Ferrari 212 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,561 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 212 (163 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212.
Because 1952 Ferrari 212 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 212. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 212 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ferrari | Volkswagen |
Model | 212 | Polo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2561 cc | 1423 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 45 L |