1952 Ferrari 212 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,562 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 212 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 212 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ferrari | Smart |
Model | 212 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2562 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 81.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 33 L |