1952 Ferrari 225 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 225. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 225 would be higher. At 2,715 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 225 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 225 (210 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 225 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ferrari 225 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ferrari 225 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 225. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 225 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ferrari | Renault |
Model | 225 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2715 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 76.8 mm |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 985 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 50 L |