1952 Ferrari 255 S vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 255 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 255 S would be higher. At 2,715 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 255 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 255 S (208 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 255 S should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 1952 Ferrari 255 S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 255 S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1952 Ferrari 255 S has manual transmission. 1952 Ferrari 255 S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ferrari 255 S | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ferrari | Holden |
| Model | 255 S | Epica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2715 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
