1952 Ferrari 255 S vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 255 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 255 S would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 1952 Ferrari 255 S. (208 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1952 Ferrari 255 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 255 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 255 S | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Ferrari | Cadillac |
Model | 255 S | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2715 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 68 L |