1952 Ferrari 340 MM vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 340 MM would be higher. At 4,102 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 210 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 340 MM.
Because 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ferrari 340 MM | 1996 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ferrari | Renault |
| Model | 340 MM | Megane |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4102 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1089 kg | 1299 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2460 mm |
