1952 Ferrari 340 MM vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 340 MM would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2000 Ford Falcon. (268 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 209 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 340 MM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ferrari 340 MM | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 340 MM | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4102 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1089 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2800 mm |
