1952 Ferrari 340 MM vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 340 MM would be higher. At 4,102 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM should accelerate faster than 2009 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ferrari 340 MM weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ferrari 340 MM | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ferrari | Toyota |
Model | 340 MM | Matrix |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4102 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1089 kg | 1074 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |