1952 Ferrari 340 MM vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 340 MM would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Ferrari 340 MM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ferrari 340 MM | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Ferrari | Chevrolet |
| Model | 340 MM | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4102 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.7 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2852 mm |
