1952 Fiat 1400 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Triumph 2000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Triumph 2000 (89 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Fiat 1400. (88 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Fiat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 1400 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | 1400 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1394 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |