1952 Fiat 1400 vs. 1968 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1968 Mercury Cougar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Cougar (137 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 270 kg more than 1952 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 1400 | 1968 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | 1400 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1952 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1394 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 137 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |