1952 Fiat 1400 vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara (81 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400.
Because 1952 Fiat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 1952 Fiat 1400 has manual transmission. 1952 Fiat 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat 1400 | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
| Make | Fiat | Monteverdi |
| Model | 1400 | Sahara |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1394 cc | 3253 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2550 mm |
