1952 Fiat 1400 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (64 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400.
Because 1952 Fiat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Fiat 1400. (88 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Fiat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 1400 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 1400 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1394 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |